header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DYNAMIC FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME ASSESSMENT IN NAVIGATED TKR USING GAIT ANALYSIS



Abstract

Performing Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery using computer assisted navigation systems results in more reproducibly accurate component alignment. Navigation allows real time evaluation of passive knee behaviour throughout flexion. These kinematic measurements reflect tibial rotation about the femoral condyles, patellar tracking and soft tissue balance throughout surgery. In this study, we aim to study dynamic knee function in navigated and standard instrumentation TKR patients performing a range of everyday activities using gait analysis.

A prospective randomised controlled trial evaluated the functional outcome using gait analysis with 20 patients in each of three groups – Standard, Navigated and Control. The same implant (Scorpio) and navigation system (Strykervision) was used for each patient. The control group were subjects with no history of knee pathology or gait abnormality. Using an 8-camera Vicon motion analysis system set at 120Hz (real-time motion), we assessed the following functional activies: walking, rising from/sitting in chair, ascending/descending stairs. One functional outcome measure we have analysed so far is the maximum flexion angle.

The maximum flexion angle was recorded for each activity in standard, navigated and control groups respectively. ANOVA was performed, with significance set at p< 0.05. Maximum flexion angle during gait was 65.6°, 72.6° (p=0.009) and 73.5° (p=0.74), chair rising/sitting was 82.5°, 92.8° (p=0.01), and 93.5° (p=0.64), stairs ascent/descent was 81.8°, 99° (p< 0.0001), and 113.4° (p< 0.0001).

In terms of dynamic functional outcome, we found that the average maximum flexion angle for the navigated group was greater than for the standard group; moreover, this was similar to the maximum flexion angle for the control group when performing a variety of normal daily activities.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K. Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, 82 Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5NX UK. E Mail: caosuk@gmail.com