header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A FRAME OF REFERENCE OF THE PATELLA



Abstract

Patellofemoral symptoms are a prominent cause of dissatisfaction following knee arthroplasty. This may relate to difficulty in knowing where to resect the bone and in placing prosthetic components to reproduce the anatomy accurately. This study developed geometrical data to facilitate these procedures during TKR.

Thirty CT scans of patients above the age of 55 without patellofemoral disease were performed. Three dimensional images were reconstructed using computer software that enabled manipulation of these images and measurements to be taken. These models allowed the shape of the patella to be modelled, its size and the track it takes in the normal trochlea.

The anterior and proximal patellar planes could be described as flat surfaces with an rms of 0.4 and 0.3mm. The angle between these planes was 112° (stdev 5°). The median ridge of the articular surface was a straight line with an rms of 0.2mm and the average angle between the anterior plane and this line was 12° (stdev4°). The angle between the anterior plane and a line fitted to the posterior aspect of the apex of the patella was 56° (stdev 2°). Having oriented the patella with the proximal plane vertical, the distal pole of the patella was within 2mm of the same sagittal plane as the median ridge of the articular surface in all cases. The functional centre of the patella was defined as a point in the centre of 2 planes orthogonal to the sagittal plane at the midpoint between the most proximal and most distal points on the median ridge. In the transverse section this centre was always on the line separating the superficial and deep surfaces of the patella. Also the length, width and thickness of the patellae were measured at 22mm +/−4mm, 47mm +/− 3mm and 24 mm+/− 2 mm. The average ratio of the lateral facet to medial facet width was 1.3 (range 0.8–1.6). The average ratio of the patellar width to thickness was 2.0 (S.D. 0.106, 95%CI 1.96 to 2.03) with a strong correlation(r= 0.89).

From this work we have concluded that the anterior and proximal planes of the patella, which will not be affected by the disease, can be defined and used as a frame of reference for the patella, which will be helpful for navigating the patella and restoring its anatomical form in the presence of erosive changes.

The patella has a constant shape, so that its articular surface can be defined in relatively simple terms, and can be referenced off its non articular surface.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K. Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, 82 Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5NX UK. E Mail: caosuk@gmail.com