header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TEN-YEAR RESULTS OF A COMPOSITE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT STEM IN YOUNG PATIENTS.



Abstract

Introduction: A composite femoral stem was introduced with a structural stiffness similar to that of the native femur to promote proximal load transfer. This consisted of a cobalt-chromium alloy core surrounded by an injection-moulded layer of polyaryletherketone covered with a porous titanium mesh.

Materials and Method : 31 primary total hip replacement stems were implanted in 26 patients with an average age of 37 years (range 17–57) using the Epoch Stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) as part of a prospective multicentre trial. A cementless Harris-Galante I acetabular component with a 28mm polyethylene insert was used in 28 cases, a Plasma cup (Aesculap) in 1 case and a bipolar head in 2 cases. Annual follow-up using Harris Hip Scores and radiographic evaluation was performed for a mean of 10.1 years.

Results: Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 56 points preoperatively to 90 at the time of last follow-up. Radiographs showed no stem migration or loosening. 4 cases with polyethylene wear showed trochanteric osteolysis. Specific radiographic features noted were calcar rounding in 10 cases and improvement in calcar appearance with squaring in 4 cases. Calcar resorption was seen in 1 case associated with polyethylene wear. There have been 9 instances of revision of the head or acetabular component – 3 liner exchanges for polyethylene wear, 3 liner exchanges for dissociation, 1 acetabular component revision for infection and 2 bipolar heads revised to unipolar heads with cementless acetabular component for pain. No stem has required or requires revision.

Discussion: The Epoch stem resulted in an excellent clinical outcome, with evidence of radiographic stability and proximal bone preservation, and no cases of stem revision in a small cohort of young patients at 10-year follow-up. The limitation of reconstruction in this cohort of young patients has been the acetabular component.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr John Hodgkinson, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.