header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

“WHICH SCREW FOR WHICH BONE?” – A COMPARISON OF MAXIMUM COMPRESSION FORCE OF CANCELLOUS SCREWS IN DIFFERENT BONE DENSITY MODELS



Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the maximum compression force of three different 6.5 mm cancellous screws commonly used in hindfoot fusions.

Materials and methods: Screw 1 was a solid core standard fragment partially threaded cancellous screw (Smith and Nephew).

Screw 2 was a titanium cannulated screw with a medium thread pitch (Asnis III, Stryker).

Screw 3 was also a titanium cannulated screw with a large core diameter but with a small thread pitch (Ace, DePuy).

Four different densities of polyurethane foams were used simulating cancellous bone and the compression

Results: Screw 3 had the highest compression force in tests with the low density foams (p< 0.05) and screw 1 performed better in higher density foams (p< 0.05). In medium density foams, both screws 1 and 3 showed significantly more compression than screw 2 (p< 0.05).

Clinical relevance: The results indicate that the 6.5 mm standard fragment non-cannulated cancellous screw may provide more compression in a normal density bone whereas in an osteoporotic bone a cannulated titanium screw may be preferred for producing better compression during arthrodesis.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.