SURGICAL CORRECTION OF SPINAL DEFORMITIES FOLLOWING SPINAL CORD INJURY OCCURRING IN CHILDHOOD

Abstract

Summary of background data. The development of a spinal deformity, usually affecting the coronal and occasionally the sagittal balance of the spine is a recognised complication of paralysis following a spinal cord injury (SCI) occurring in childhood.

Purpose of the study. The aim of the present study was to report our experience on the surgical treatment of patients who developed a paralytic spinal deformity secondary to SCIs occurring in childhood.

Material-Methods. Our study cohort comprised 18 consecutive patients with a paralytic spinal deformity as a consequence of a SCI. The cause of paralysis in this group of patients included a traumatic incident in 10 patients, spinal cord tumour in 6 patients, vascular injury to the neural cord during cardiac surgery in one patient, and meningitis in one patient. Twelve patients presented with high- or mid-thoracic paraparesis, which was complete in all but two patients. Six patients developed tetraparesis, which was incomplete in 3 of these patients.

Results. Fourteen patients underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities; 11 patients had a scoliosis, 2 had a lordoscoliosis, and one had a kyphosis. The mean age at spinal arthrodesis was 13.4 years. Eleven patients underwent a posterior spinal fusion alone and 3 patients underwent a combined anterior and posterior spinal arthrodesis. Posterior spinal instrumentation with bilateral Luque rods and segmental fixation with sublaminar wires was used in all but one patient who was stabilised with the use of third generation spinal instrumentation. The spinal fusion extended to the sacrum in 10 of the 14 patients (71.4%) using the Galveston technique of intra-iliac pelvic fixation.

None of the patients developed postoperative wound infections, either early or late. There were no major medical complications following surgery in this group of patients that would result in prolonged intensive care unit or hospital stay. Four of the 14 patients (28.6%) who had initially undergone a posterior spinal arthrodesis alone developed an asymptomatic pseudarthrosis with failure of the instrumentation. The non-union was treated successfully in 2 of these 4 patients with a combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion. The repair of the pseudarthrosis was performed through a repeat posterior spinal fusion in the remaining 2 patients and one of these patients necessitated a second revision procedure to address recurrence of the non-union.

Conclusions. The high rate of pseudarthrosis (28.6%) recorded in the present series suggests that a combined anterior and posterior spinal arthrodesis could be considered as the initial treatment of choice for patients who are at a good general medical condition to tolerate anterior surgery and who have severe deformities. If pseudarthrosis develops following an isolated posterior spinal fusion, this can be treated more effectively by a combined anterior and posterior revision procedure with the use of instrumentation, which can increase the chances for a successful outcome.