header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

P99 WHAT IS IMPORTANT IN CARTILAGE REPAIR-MACROSCOPIC GRADING OR HISTOLOGY?



Abstract

Aims: To investigate

  1. the influence of histology on durability of cartilage repair following collagen-covered autologous chon-drocyte implantation (ACI-C) in the knee.

  2. the relationship between macroscopic grading and durability of cartilage repair; and

  3. the relationship between macroscopic appearance and histology of repair tissue.

Patients and methods: The modified Cincinnati scores (MCRS) of eighty-six patients were evaluated prospectively at one year and at the latest follow-up (mean follow-up = 4.7yrs. Range = 4 to 7 years). Biopsies of their cartilage repair site were stained with Haema-toxylin and Eosin and some with Safranin O and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline-like (n=32), mixed fibro-hyaline (n=19) and fibro-cartilagenous tissue (n=35). Macroscopic grading of the repair tissue using the international cartilage repair society grading system (ICRS) was available for fifty-six patients in this study cohort. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the significance of histology and ICRS grading on MCRS at 1 year and at the latest follow-up.

Results: The MCRS of all three histology groups were comparable at one year evaluation (p=0.34). However, their clinical scores at the latest follow-up showed a significantly superior result for those with hyaline-like repair tissue when compared to those with mixed fibro-hyaline and fibro-cartilagenous repair (p=0.05).

There was no correlation between the ICRS grading and MCRS either at one year (p=0.12) or at the latest follow-up (p=0.16). Also, the ICRS grading of the repair tissue did not correlate with its histological type (p=0.12).

Conclusion: We conclude that any form of cartilage repair gives good clinical outcome at one year. At four years and beyond, hyaline-like repair tissue produces a more favourable clinical outcome. Macroscopic evaluation using the ICRS grading system does not reflect the clinical outcome or its durability or the histological type of repair tissue.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.