header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

FURTHER BIOMECHANICAL AND KINEMATIC ANALYSES OF INVERSE DESIGNS OF SHOULDER PROSTHESES



Abstract

Background: The Delta Inverse Shoulder Arthroplasty, has gained considerable popularity in France and Europe for Rotator Cuff (RC) deficient patients. However complications related to surgical difficulties with insertion, mechanical loosening, and polyethylene (PE) wear are now being reported. The increasing numbers of complications are alarming.

Methods: A computerised analysis of the kinematics associated with inverse shoulder replacements has been developed. Different glenoid dome sizes and humeral cup dimensions have been tested. This has highlighted the deficiencies associated with the design of the inverse shoulder prostheses currently available on the market. Modifications of the prosthesis geometry and the inclusion of a mobile bearing have also been subjected to computer analysis and have demonstrated improved kinematics and a reduction in the risk of bone/prosthesis contact. A medium term follow-up of 9 patients with a mobile bearing Inverse shoulder design has been carried out. Compression tests have been carried out on the PE bearing to identify the risk of plastic deformity of the PE.

Results: The results of the computerised analysis and the clinical results from the first 9 patients will be reported. One patient suffered an operative complication with failure of reduction of the prosthesis which was rectified at an immediate re-operation. The early clinical results are similar to the good results obtained with the Delta prosthesis. However polyethylene bearing failure has occurred in one case, highlighting the importance of optimising the geometry of the inverse shoulder. Both Radio-Stereometric Analyses (RSA) and prospective randomised studies comparing this Inverse prosthesis with either a Cuff Tear Arthropathy (CTA) hemiarthroplasty designes (when Gleno-Humeral(GH) OA is present) or with cuff reconstruction using augmentation (when no GH OA is present) have been designed and will be discussed.

The abstracts were prepared by Cormac Kelly. Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, British Elbow and Shoulder Society, Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE