Abstract
Introduction: Hip resurfacing is a good conservative option for young patients with arthritis. Resurfacings risk two unique failure mechanisms that do not occur in THA, i.e. femoral neck fracture and femoral head collapse.
Old age, osteopaenia, alcohol abuse, and large cysts are risk factors for fractures. It has been suggested that performing a bilateral resurfacing puts the first side at risk of fracture from the force used in implanting the second resurfacing. Is this a true risk or a sampling error?
Methods: Out of 2576 consecutive resurfacings performed by the senior author (July 1997 – May 2005), 191 patients (382 hips, 14.8% of all resurfacings) presented with bilateral arthritis and had both hips operated in the same hospital admission. 133 patients had the two operations a week apart and 58 had both the same day. A posterior approach was used in all cases with the patient in the lateral position on the contralateral side.
Results: Of the 382 resurfacings, only two failed from a femoral neck fracture. Both had the second operation a week after the first. A 35-year lady (rheumatoid arthritis) sustained a femoral neck fracture of the first hip following a fall nine weeks after the operation. A 57-year man (osteoarthritis) fractured his femoral neck at 3.5 months. He fractured the side operated second.
Discussion: The incidence of femoral neck fracture in the author’s series of 2576 resurfacings is 0.4%. Patients who present with bilateral severe arthritis are more likely to have non-primary OA such as inflammatory arthritis. It is difficult to conclude if such bilateral cases are more predisposed to a fracture by virtue of the pathology itself.
The low incidence of fractures (2/382, 0.5%) in this bilateral resurfacing series does not support the view that there is an increased risk of fracture from a bilateral procedure.
Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
