header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPLICATIONS OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT WITH LX PROSTHESIS – CONCERNS ABOUT PROSTHESIS DESIGN



Abstract

Introduction: Design of the prosthesis is an important factor in the successful outcome and longevity of total hip replacement. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the minimum six-year results of primary total hip replacement using LX cemented prosthesis.

Methods: We prospectively studied 177 patients (60 male and 117 female) who underwent 197 hip replacements, between 1996 and 1999, using LX cemented prosthesis comprising a femoral component with cylindrical cross section of the stem and an acetabular component of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. The average follow up was 7.3 years (6.1–9.6years). Clinical (Harris Hip Score) and radiological assessments (Barrack’s grading of cementation, subsidence, debonding, radiolucent lines and osteolysis) were performed.

Results: The average Harris Hip Score is 85.53 (28–99) compared to the preoperative score of 59.28. 28 cases (14.2%) developed progressive radiolucent lines around the stem. Sinking and debonding of the stem was noted in 18 cases (9.1%). 15 hips (7.6%) have dislocated and 11 were recurrent dislocations. Revision hip replacement was carried out in 12 cases (6%) for subsidence and debonding of stem, cement fracture and recurrent dislocation. The femoral stem components were found to be loose at the time of surgery.

Discussion: We believe that design of the prosthesis is an important factor in the high incidence of subsidence and debonding of the femoral stem. Both the geometry (cylindrical shape) and the rough surface finish (Ra value 100 microinches) were responsible for the pattern of progressive loosening. Lack of progressive increase in the offset with increase in the size of femoral component from 1 to 2 is one of the factors which contributed to high incidence of dislocation.

Correspondence should be addressed to The Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.