COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMED ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH LATERAL EXTRA-ARTICULAR PLASTY: A RANDOMIZED SERIES OF 63 PATIENTS WITH SEVEN YEARS FOLLOW-UP

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has become a common procedure. We compared two randomized series: intra-articular (Kenneth-Jones) versus intra- and extra-articular (MacInJones).

Material and methods: From January 1995 through March 1998, 73 knees were treated surgically for differential medial laxity measured at 7 to 12 mm on passive stress x-rays in 20° flexion. Group 1 (ACL reconstruction alone) included 34 patients (aged 27.1±7.5 years). Group 2 (ACL reconstruction plus extra-articular plasty) included 29 patients (aged 28.5±12 years). Function was scored 72% in group 1 and 68% in group 2 at mean seven years follow-up (102 and 93 months follow-up respectively). Anterior laxity was measured radiographically and with KT-1000 and the position of the tunnels was assessed according to Aglietti.

Results: According to the IKDC, functional outcome was 83.9±3.1 in group 1 and 83.3±3.6 in group 2. The overall IKDC classification was 0A, 57.8% B, 26.3% C, and 15.7% D for group 1 and 58% A, 52.9% B, 29.4% C, and 11.7% D for group 2. The pivot-shift test was negative in 61.1% of group 1 knees (27.7% grade 1 and 11.1% grade 2) and negative in 83.3% of group 2 knees (16.6% grade 1). In group 1, the radiological drawer showed 46.09% improvement in the differential laxity for the medial compartment and 41% for lateral compartment. In group 2 the corresponding improvements were 44.8% and 44.6%. There was no difference in tunnel position between the two groups.

Discussion: The two-year results of this series did not provide any evidence favoring a clear advantage of complementary lateral plasty. At seven years follow-up, the pivot-shift test appeared to favor associated lateral plasty (p=0.09), but with no significant difference in laxity for the two compartments.

Conclusion: Anterior laxity was only incompletely controlled by both reconstruction techniques. In this context of relatively limited laxity (7–12 mm initially), at seven years follow-up there was no certain advantage of complementary lateral extra-articular plasty in combination with ACL reconstruction.