header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMUPTER-ASSISTED SURGERY FOR POSITIONING ACETABULAR IMPLANTS FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Purpose of the study: Malposition of the acetabular implant of a total hip arthroplasty can provoke dislocation, limited joint movement, and early wear. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to assess the efficacy of a image-free navigation system to achieve correct acetabular position for total hip arthroplasty.

Material and methods: The navigation software for the acetabular component used intraoperative anatomic acquisition. The prospective randomized study included two groups of 20 patients. In the first group, the acetabular implant was inserted using the computer-assisted system and in the second using the conventional method. The same operator performed all procedures via an anterolateral approach and using the same non-cemented hemispheric cup. The postoperative assessment was performed by an independent investigator who noted the cup inclination on the standard ap view and cup anteversion on the computed tomography; then using a dedicated system for 3D reconstruction, the same values were determined one month after surgery.

Results: Each group included ten men and ten women, mean age 63 years and mean body mass index 24. For the computed-assisted group, mean additional operative time for navigation was 13 minutes (range 8–20 min). The intraopeartive concordance with the surgeons subjective impression was excellent for 12 patients and good for 8. Mean intraoperative values were for the computer-assisted group were: for operative mode: inclination 30° (25–46°), anteversion 14° (0–25°), radiographic mode: inclination 35° (25–47°), anteversion 13° (0–26°), anatomic mode: inclination 36°, anteversion 19° (0–27°). There was no significant difference between the intraoperative and postoperative values for the computer-assisted group. There was no significant difference between the average values between the computer-assisted and conventional groups but the standard deviation was smaller in the computer-assisted group.

Discussion and conclusion: The image-free navigation system enables reliable positioning of the prosthetic cup for total hip arthroplasty and increases the precision of acetabular implantation without increasing significantly operative time. This first step must be integrated into the computerized preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. The next step will be to use the navigation system for implanting the femoral component.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.