header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE VIABILITY OF DONOR HARVESTING FROM THE ANKLE IN MACI PROCEEDURES



Abstract

Introduction: Osteochondral lesions of the Talar Dome(OCD) remain a difficult therapeutic problem. One solution has been to consider using autologous chondrocyte implants. Though initial results of this technique are interesting the donor sites have always been in a normal knee. The presence of knee symptoms subsequently in some patients might be regarded as inevitable. This paper reports on the viabilty of donor material taken from the ankle.

Materials: Twenty four patients have been recruited to a pilot study of the viability of obtaining donated chondral material for Matrix Autologous Condrocyte Implantation. There were 14 men and 10 women. Their mean age was 37.3 years (range 17–63). All were complaining of presistent symptoms of pain and some insecurity following previous conventional surgery for treatment of a symptomatic OCD. All had MRI evidence of ongoing changes in keeping with persistent problems related to an OCD.

Methods: All patients had an initial arthroscopy of the affected ankle to reassess the state of the joint surface. Donor articular cartilage was obtained from one of three sites. The anterior part of the joint surface on the talar neck, from the medial articular facet of the talus or rarely from an area of articular cartilage on the edge of the lesion. The mean weight of the donor harvest was 133 micrograms(range51–450).

Results: All donated graft material produced viable implantable graft material between 5 and 7 weeks from harvest. Cell counts ranged from 12.3 million to 20 million with cell viabilities of 98% or above. These figures are directly comparable with the results obtained from the knee despite the original donor weights being less.

Conclusion: If this technique is contemplated the use of the affected ankle as a donor site is a viable alternative to the knee.

Correspondence should be addressed to the Honorary Secretary, BOFSS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.