header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ARE THREE DEGREES STANDARD OF EXTERNAL ROTATION ALWAYS SUFFICIENT FOR A CORRECT ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT IN TKR?



Abstract

The pourpose of this study was to investigate the variability of the posterior condylar angle and the whiteside’s angle to establish if three degrees of external rotation of the femoral component produce the correct rotational alignment, in varus knee

33 patients (33 knee) affected by varus osteoarthritic knee (5°–30°)underwent a preoperative CT scan examination of the knee and the hip. On the axial views, we have evaluated the femoral anteversion, the posterior condylar angle and the whitesiede’s angle.

The mean femoral anteversion angle was 5.5°±13.7° (−24°;33°). The mean posterior condylar angle was 6.1°±2.5° (1°;14°). The mean intraobserver error was 0.9°. In 60.6% of the cases the angle was greater than 5°. The mean Witheside’s angle was 6°±3.5° (1°;16.5°). The mean intraobserver error was 0.8°. In 51.5% of the cases the angle was greater than 5°.

Both the posterior condylar angle and the Whiteside’s angle showed values almost double than three degrees proposed as standard rotation for the femoral component. The method of three degrees standard of external rotation lead to relative internal rotation of the femoral component in TKR also for varus knee.

Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Komistek, PhD, International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. E-mail: ista@pacbell.net