header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MATHEMATICAL DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL CAM/POST POSITION AND LOCATION OF AXIAL ROTATION IN THE PFC SIGMA RP POSTERIOR-STABILIZED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the location of polyethylene post position and/or axis of polyethylene (PE) bearing rotation in order to maximize the rotational freedom of the PE bearing in a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA.

Kinematic data obtained in a previous study involving subjects implanted with the PFC Sigma RP (PS) was used in two mathematical models to determine the optimal configuration of the implant’s features. An inverse dynamics mathematical model used the kinematic input to calculate interactive forces between the implant components. The second mathematical model used the femur-polyethylene and polyethylene-tibial plate interactive forces in a forward solution giving the amount of polyethylene bearing rotation. Researchers altered the location of cam/post interaction and/or bearing rotation to determine the criteria for optimal bearing rotation.

During flexion, the maximum femur-polyethylene contact force calculated by the inverse model was 1.9 x BW, at maximum flexion. Maximum quadriceps, patello-femoral, and patellar ligament forces were approx. 2.9 x BW, 2.8 x BW, and 1.5 x BW at maximum flexion, respectively. We determined that the sample group experienced an average maximum bearing rotation of approximately 3.5°. Maximum bearing rotation reached approx 12.5° (10°–15°) with a 5mm lateral shift in cam/post engagement. Bearing rotation reached approximately 17.5° (15°–20°) by shifting the bearing axis 5mm posterior to that of the current design. Shifting the cam/post mechanism or bearing axis by greater than 5mm in any direction produced undesirable results.

The mathematical models used in this study were verified by comparing kinematic results obtained from a 3-D model-fitting program whereby models are matched to their respective silhouettes in a 2-D fluoroscopic image. Results from this study show that the rotational freedom of the PE bearing can be optimized by shifting its axis of rotation posterior to its present location.

Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Komistek, PhD, International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. E-mail: ista@pacbell.net