header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MODEL-BASED ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC ANALYSIS (RSA)



Abstract

Model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) measures micromotion of an orthopaedic implant with respect to its surrounding bone, without the use of markers on the implant. In previous studies with a total knee prosthesis, Model-based RSA showed to be very accurate. In this study, Model-based RSA is validated in a phantom experiment of a total hip prosthesis.

A metal backed, elliptical shaped EP-FIT PLUS ®cup was used in combination with a SL-PLUS ® hip-stem from PLUS Endoprothetik AG. In vivo conditions were simulated by using sawbones and perspex plates to mimic the bones and soft tissue. Virtual projections of the CAD models of the implant were fitted on the automatically detected contours in nine RSA radiographs and the error inmigration calculation was determined.

The standard deviations of the error in translation for the cup were: 0.03, 0.05, and 0.21 mm. (x, y, z-direction) The standard deviations of the error in orientation were respectively 0.56, 0.48, and 0.18 degrees (n = 10). For the stem, the standard deviations of the error in translation are: 0.09, 0.11, and 0.29 mm and for the orientation: 0.63, 2.03, and 0.24 degrees (n = 0).

The results for the cup are satisfactory, and make Model-based RSA a good alternative for conventional RSA. Especially for this type of metal backed, non hemispherical cup for which no markerless alternative is available. The error in orientation around the y-axis of the stem is of concern. Experiments with models from Reversed Engineering had similar low accuracy. We expect that the cause of these inaccuracies is the rectangular cross sectional shape of this specific hip stem, and we expect better results from experiments with differently shaped stems. The results of this study make very clear that Model-based RSA is avaluable and accurate technique, but phantom studies are always necessary to validate the accuracy for a specific implant shape.

Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Komistek, PhD, International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. E-mail: ista@pacbell.net