header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE PHYSIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF THE REAMER IRRIGATOR ASPIRATOR ON FAT EMBOLISM OUTCOME USING A PORCINE MO



Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) on fat embolism outcome, as compared to the standard AO reamer, utilizing physiologic parameters as outcome measures.

Methods: All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee. Fifteen animal experiments were completed. Following anesthesia, each pig was intubated and ventilated. Initial blood samples were analyzed for proper ventilation and acceptable baseline conditions (PaCO2 between 35–40 mm Hg). One third of the pig’s blood volume was withdrawn to simulate hemorrhagic shock. Each animal was kept in a state of hypovolemia for an hour before transfusion and resuscitation. Each pig underwent alternate assignment into either the RIA or AO group. The distal femur was exposed and reamed in a retrograde fashion, followed by cement pressurization with methylmethacrylate. Physiologic measurements included mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), and cardiac output. Upon completion, the animals were euthanized. The data was analyzed using the SPSS statistical program.

Results: One animal in the AO group expired after cement pressurization associated with profound hypotension, pulmonary hypertension and eventual cardiac arrest. There was a statistically significant difference for PaO2 (P = 0.004), cardiac output (P = 0.002), and PAP (P = 0.005) between the AO and RIA groups. That is, by the completion of the experiment the RIA group had higher PaO2, lower PAP, and higher cardiac output measurements as compared to the AO group. There was no statistical significance between the two groups with respect to MAP (P = 0.468).

Conclusions: Using established physiologic parameters, there appears to be a difference between the standard AO reamer and the RIA in terms of fat embolism outcome. The RIA showed a more favorable outcome with respect to PAP, PaO2, and cardiac output. With its simultaneous irrigation and aspiration, the RIA may result in less intramedullary fat displacement into the systemic circulation.

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada