header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE EFFECT OF ACTIVE LOADING ON TRANSLATION OF THE HUMERAL HEAD DURING GLENOHUMERAL ABDUCTION



Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of passive and active muscle loading on humeral head translation during glenohumeral abduction. A shoulder simulator produced unconstrained active glenohumeral abduction using several sets of loading ratios. Significantly greater translations occurred in passive motion as compared to active motion between 30 and 70 degrees of elevation in three dimensions and in the anterosuperior plane. No difference was found between the active motions. Also, translations of the humeral head decreased with active simulation of abduction emphasizing the importance of the rotator cuff muscles in creating and maintaining the ball-and-socket kinematics of the shoulder.

This in-vitro study was conducted to determine the effect of passive and active loading on humeral head translation during glenohumeral abduction.

Five cadaveric shoulders were tested using a shoulder simulator designed to produce unconstrained abduction of the humerus. Forces were applied to simulate loading of the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid muscles using four different sets of loading ratios. These were based on:

  1. equal loads to all cables (Constant-Constant);

  2. average physiological cross-sectional areas (pCSAs) of the muscles (pCSA);

  3. constant (Constant EMG), and

  4. variable (Variable EMG) values of the product of electromyographic data and pCSAs.

In three dimensions, significantly greater translations occurred in passive motion as compared to active motion between 30 and 70 degrees of elevation (p< 0.001). No difference was found between the active motions. Similar results were observed in the two-dimensional resultant translations in the anterosuperior plane of the scapula, with more translation occurring during passive motion (3.6 ± 1.1mm) than active (2.1 ± 1.0mm) (p=0.002), and no significant differences between the active loading methods (Figure 1). The majority of translation tended to occur in the superior-inferior direction for all loading ratios employed.

It was clearly shown that the translations of the humeral head decreased with active simulation of abduction. These findings are in agreement with other in-vivo and in-vitro investigations.

This emphasizes the importance of the rotator cuff muscles in creating and maintaining the ball-and-socket kinematics of the shoulder.

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada