header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DOES DELAY MATTER? THE RESTORATION OF OBJECTIVELY MEASURED SHOULDER STRENGTH AND PATIENT ORIENTED OUTCOME IN IMMEDIATE FIXATION VERSUS DELAYED RECONSTRUCTION OF DISPLACED MID-SHAFT FRACTURES OF THE CLAVICLE.



Abstract

When deciding on treatment for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures, patients often inquire if repair of (potential) nonunion results in outcome similar to acute fixation. We used objective muscle strength testing and patient-oriented outcome measures to examine this question. Late reconstruction of nonunion following displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle results in restoration of objective muscle strength similar to that seen with immediate fixation. However, there was a significant loss in muscle endurance as well as a trend towards a decrease in outcome scores (DASH, Constant) following late reconstruction. This information is useful in surgical decision making and in counseling patients.

Using objectively measured strength and patient-oriented health-status instruments, we sought to determine if delay in repair of displaced, mid-shaft clavicle fractures negatively affected shoulder strength or outcome.

Late reconstruction of clavicle nonunion results in restoration of objective muscle strength similar to that seen with immediate fracture fixation, but there was a significant loss in muscle endurance as well as a trend towards a decrease in outcome scores (DASH, Constant).

All patients had sustained completely displaced, closed, isolated mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Fifteen patients had immediate plate fixation (mean 0.6 months post-fracture) and fifteen had plate fixation for non-union (mean fifty-eight months post-fracture). Objective muscle strength testing on the BTE was done a mean of twenty-nine months post-fixation (normal contralateral limb as control). There were no significant differences between acute fixation and delayed reconstruction groups with regards to strength of shoulder flexion (acute = 92.4%, delayed = 89.4%, p=0.56), shoulder abduction (acute = 98.8%, delayed = 96.7, p=0.75), external rotation (acute = 98.4%, delayed = 91.9%, p=0.29), or internal rotation (acute = 96.3%, delayed = 97.4%, p=0.87). However, there was a trend for improved Constant scores (acute = 94.5, delayed = 90, p=0.09) and the DASH scores (acute = 3.4, delayed = 9.0, p=0.09) in the acute fixation group. We found a significant decrease in muscle endurance with regards to shoulder flexion (acute = 107.0%, delayed = 71.1%, p=0.007) and a trend towards weaker shoulder abduction (acute = 103.1%, delayed = 88.7 %).

Funding: Mr. Potter was supported by a St. Michael’s Hospital Summer Student Scholarship

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada