header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE EFFECT OF MUSCLE LOADS ON DISTAL RADIOULNAR JOINT REACTION FORCES IN-VITRO



Abstract

This study quantified the joint reaction forces in the distal radioulnar joint using an instrumented ulnar head replacement implant. Muscle activity was simulated in-vitro to determine the effects on joint reaction force. Forces were found to linearly increase with simulated muscle load in all forearm positions for the biceps and pronator teres muscles. However, this did not occur for simulations of the supinator and pronator quadratus muscles, likely due to their broader insertion, smaller size and non-linear lines-of-action. This work has important implications in forearm biomechanical modelling, implant design, fixation and rehabilitation protocols following arthroplasty.

To determine the relationship between forearm muscle activity and joint reaction force (JRF) in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

The DRUJ reaction force is linearly related to the muscle activity of the PT and biceps, but not necessarily to the activity of the supinator and PQ.

This work has implications for biomechanical modelling, implant design, fixation and rehabilitation protocols following DRUJ arthroplasty.

JRFs were found to increase linearly with muscle load for all muscles simulated (biceps, pronator teres (PT), pronator quadratus (PQ), supinator) in all forearm positions tested (supination, neutral and pronation) (correlation coefficient r> 0.85, p< 0.01) with two exceptions; simulation of the PQ in the neutral position (r=−0.65, p=0.2), and the supinator in the pronated position (r=0.72, p=0.2). Biceps simulation generated larger JRF magnitudes in all positions compared to other muscles (p< 0.001), and the PQ generated larger JRF magnitudes compared to the supinator (p=0.05).

Ulnar head arthroplasty was performed with a replacement ulnar head implant instrumented with strain gauges to allow measurement of the DRUJ reaction force. An upper extremity joint simulator applied muscle loads in seven fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities through computer-controlled pneumatic actuators. Load was varied in 10N increments from 10-80N (biceps and PT) and from 10-50N (PQ and supinator). A hand clamp was used to restrain the forearm in varying positions. The results illustrate that broad insertion and non-linear muscles may not be linearly correlated to joint reaction force in the DRUJ.

Please contact author for diagrams and graphs.

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada