SO YOU WANT TO GET PUBLISHED? A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION IN THE SPINE LITERATURE.

Abstract

Independent reviewers performed systematic reviews of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISSLS and the CSS. Papers employing blinded or independent review of outcome were the strongest predictor of publication and papers employing this had an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 for being published compared to those papers that did not. Other significant factors include use of an experimental design, statistically positive result, and basic science research.

To identify factors associated with eventual peer-reviewed publication in spinal research presented at national and international meetings.

This review has highlighted factors that are associated with eventual peer-reviewed publication. It will also present comparisons between the International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS) and the Canadian Spine Society (CSS).

Independent reviewers performed systematic reviews of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISSLS and the CSS. All abstracts reviewed were categorized into type of research and aspects of research quality were identified. A medline database, blinded to the results of the review, was performed to identify abstracts that went onto peer-reviewed publication.

Univariate and multivariate analyses reviewed that blinding, use of an experimental design, basic science or biomechanical research, and a statistically significant positive result were significant predictors of eventual publication. Papers employing blinded or independent review of outcome were the strongest predictor of publication and papers employing this had an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 for being published compared to those papers that did not. Other significant factors include use of an experimental design, statistically positive result, and basic science research. Overall, 23% of ISSLS’ abstracts were published within one year and 67% within two years. In contrast, 6% and 13% of CSS abstracts were published within one and two years respectively.