Abstract
Conventional treatment for nondisplaced intracapsular hip fractures is with cannulated screws. Some authors have argued that in the older patient a hemiarthroplasty offers a better outcome even in the case of a nondisplaced fracture. We have compared the outcomes of an age, sex & co-morbidity matched cohort of 346 patients who have had their nondisplaced hip fracture treated using cannulated screws with a group of 346 patients who have had a displaced fracture treated with a hemi-arthroplasty. The average age of the patients studied was 80.8 years. All operations were carried out at Peter-borough District Hospital and the follow up data was collected as part of the hip fracture project. Operation time, hospital stay and peroperative complication rate are less for the fixation group. They also have better outcomes in terms of pain, use of walking aids and mobility scores at one year. Mortality is 4% less at one year in the patients treated with screws and this, again, is statistically significant. There is no difference in terms of residential status at one year. In patients where the fracture is initially treated with cannulated screws the reoperation rate is considerably higher (17 % versus 6%) but length of stay is less for secondary procedures. We feel that there is little evidence to justify the use of hemi-arthroplasty in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients of any age.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
