header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OPEN BANKART PROCEDURE VERSUS ARTHROSCOPIC EXTRA-ARTICULAR STABILISATION OF THE SHOULDER

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to compare open Bankart procedure and arthroscopic extra-articular stabilization of the shoulder in patients with anterior instability.

Material and Methods: 236 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were treated surgically between 1992 and 2002. Open Bankart procedure was performed in 177 patients, mean age 29 years (range 17–67), and arthroscopic extra-articular stabilization in 59 patients, mean age 27 years (range 14–45). Single surgeon was performed all surgery. Follow-up for open surgery was from 2 to10 years, and for arthroscopic stabilization from 12 to 60 months.

Results: Constant score for Bankart procedure was 90 points and for arthroscopic stabilization was 96 points. Five patients (2.8%) had re-dislocation after open procedure and three patients (5,1%) after arthroscopic stabilization.

Conclusion: Open Bankart is more reliable than arthroscopic stabilisation of the shoulder. However, arthroscopic stabilisation has more advantages; better ROM, better function and cosmesis, lesser morbidity and small violation of normal anatomy.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.