header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOLLOWING ACETABULAR FRACTURE. A MINIMAL 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective study was to report on the minimal 5-year follow-up results of a consecutive series of cemented total hip arthroplasties following acetabular fracture.

Materials and methods: Between January 1980 and December 1995, fifty-three total hip arthroplasties were performed in 53 patients (16 females and 37 males). The mean age of the patients at the time of the index arthroplasty was 53.1 years (range, 24–84 years). The initial fracture concerned one wall in 18 patients, one column in 7, and both columns in 6. It was a complex fracture in 11 patients, and was unknown in the remaining 11 patients. Twenty-three of the 53 fractures had had a non-operative treatment, while 30 had had a surgical treatment. The mean time between the fracture and the arthroplasty was 16.4 10.8 years. All prostheses were of Charnley-Kerboull design, combining a 22.2-mm femoral head and an all-polyethylene socket. Both components were cemented.

Results: At the minimum 5-year follow-up evaluation, 35 patients were still alive and had not been revised at a mean of 12.4 3.8 years (range, 7–21 years), 6 patients had been revised, 5 patients had died from unrelated causes, and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. The mean Merle d’Aubigne hip score was 16.7 1.3 at the latest follow-up. Revision was performed for high polyethylene wear associated with periprosthetic osteolysis in 5 hips at a mean of 10.3 years, and for deep sepsis in one. The survival rate of the whole series at 15 years, using revision for any reason as the end-point, was 79.2 9.7 % (95% confidence interval, 60.3 to 98.2%). The survival rate at 15 years, using radiologic loosening as the end-point, was 94.7 % (95% confidence interval, 84.7 to 100%) for hips of which fracture had been treated non-operatively, versus 75.5 13.0% (95% confidence interval, 49.9 to 100%) for hips of which fracture had been surgically treated. The difference was not significant with the numbers available (log-rank test, p = 0.44).

Discussion and conclusion: The results of this series indicated that the mechanical failure rate of total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture was high in the mid- to long-term. The young age of the patients, the predominantly male cohort, and the modifications of the acetabulum structure due to the fracture could account for this phenomenon.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.