header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OUTCOME OF DISPLACED SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS IN CHILDREN.

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Aim: Retrospective analysis of paediatric supracondylar fractures treated by various closed and open methods of management and study co-relation between type of treatment and outcome.

Method: Retrospective review of children with displaced supracodylar fractures of humerus consecutively treated between January 1999 and December 2003. We included all the patients (63 children) admitted to hospital and had closed or open surgical procedure. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify type of management, pre or postoperative complications, including loss of fracture reduction, infection, loss of motion of elbow and the need for additional surgery. 13 cases were excluded as insufficient records available and patients have either moved from area or treated on injury on holidays.

Results: In this study 70% of children were less than 8 year old. Except for one all the patients had extension type of injury and 58% of total cases had Gartland type III fracture configuration. 38% of patients were treated with closed reduction and immobilisation, 24% had closed reduction and percutaneus k-wires fixation and remaining had open reduction and internal fixation. All the patients underwent procedure with in 12 hrs of admission to hospital. Six patients had pre-operative neuro-vascular compromise and all of these patients recovered completely post-operatively. Loss of position was noted in 20% of children who had only manipulation and required re-manipulation and stabilisation with percutaneus k-wire fixation. All percutaneus fixations were with two lateral entry pin fixation and Open reduction were fixed with cross pin fixation. There was no clinically evident hyperextension or loss of motion but one patient (Gartland type III) who was treated with MUA and immobilisation required corrective osteotomy for cubitus varus. One patient had pin track infection but there was no iatrogenic nerve palsy.

Conclusion: Lateral entry pin fixation is very safe mode of fixation for percutaneus treatment and gives excellent results. Treatment with Manipulation and immobilisation for Gartland type III fractures does not give satisfactory results. We suspect early treatment of these fractures reduces comorbidity and early complications.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.