header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HIP ARTHROGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP AND PERTHES’ DISEASE

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Aims: To assess the value of hip arthrography in planning definitive treatment for children with DDH and Perthes’ disease.

Background: It is sometimes unclear whether children with DDH and Perthes’ disease need an operation. Surgeons are guided by the clinical symptoms and signs together with the radiographic appearances of the affected hip. In our Unit children on whom an operation is considered undergo an examination under anaesthetic (EUA) and a hip arthrogram. This prospective study was developed to assess whether treatment was modified by the arthrogram.

Methods: All patients who underwent an EUA and hip arthrogram for DDH or Perthes’ disease over a 10 month period were entered into this prospective study. Prior to arthrography a Consultant Children’s Orthopaedic Surgeon formulated a treatment plan. A standard arthrogram was performed which included anteroposterior, frog lateral, Von Rosen and oblique views. Traction axial loading views were taken to assess stability. Following EUA and arthrogram the Consultant Surgeon formulated a definitive treatment plan. Three Children’s Consultants were then invited subsequently to review the preoperative and arthrographic appearances blindly to monitor reproducibility. Twenty-one patients with DDH and 19 with Perthes’ disease were entered into the study.

Results: In the DDH group of patients the treatment plan was modified in 12 of the 21 patients as a consequence of the arthrogram. Six of the 19 patients (31.6 %) of the Perthes’ affected patients had their treatment modified. When it was felt likely prior to EUA a conservative treatment was indicated. The correlation of intra-observer Consultant agreement was high but inter-observer Consultant agreement was moderate only. In both groups of patients the range of hip motion was significantly greater under anaesthesia.

Conclusion: Static and dynamic arthrography helps decision making in patients with DDH and Perthes’ disease.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.