header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPARISON OF BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FLEXIBLE STEEL AND TITANIUM INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS IN ADOLESCENT FRACTURES

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Aim: To compare the biomechanical properties of paired flexible steel and titanium nails in simulated transverse fractures of synthetic composite bones.

Methods: Steel and titanium nails (3mm diameter) were individually used in pairs of divergent configuration to study torsion, cantilever bending (anteroposterior and lateral), and axial loading properties of adolescent synthetic composite tibiae model (10mm diameter). Properties of the intact bone, simulated fresh fracture with nails and simulated healing fracture with nails were studied. Instron 4303 universal testing machine was used to study axial loading. Applying fibreglass layers around the fracture with epoxy resin simulated fracture healing with callus formation.

Results: Steel and titanium nails maintained good alignment of fracture fragments. Both the nails demonstrated very poor stability of fresh fractures in torsion loading. Steel nail/bone construct was 57% stronger than Titanium nail/bone construct under similar testing conditions during fracture healing (p< 0.05) but still < 50% stiffness of intact bone. In bending tests, both types of nails showed < 10% of the stiffness of intact bone in fresh fractures (p< 0.05). Mediolateral stiffness was better than anteroposterior stiffness. In fracture healing, the bending stiffness of both types of nail/bone constructs was > 50% that of intact bone. Axial stiffness of both nails was more than bending or torsion stiffness implying that fracture fragments play a significant role in the stability of the fracture.

Although both types of nail/bone constructs demonstrated similar stiffness results in fresh and healing fractures, steel nails performance was statistically better than Titanium nails in all loading tests (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Fractures fixed with either type of flexible nails should be supplemented with splints or plaster for a short duration until callus formation. Flexible nails should be used with caution in comminuted fractures, over weight patients since they may not provide adequate stability or allow early mobilization. Additional research with cadaver bones may provide further insight into the performance of the flexible nails.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.