header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PATELLO-FEMORAL EVALUATION AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: VALIDATION OF A NEW WEIGHT-BEARING AXIAL VIEW AND SCORING SYSTEM

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Introduction: Patello-femoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not addressed by most knee scoring systems. Patellar radiographic assessment after TKA is obtained with static, unloaded views that may not reproduce the in-vivo patello-femoral kinematics. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate new reliable and reproducible clinical and radiographic assessment tools for analysis of the patello-femoral joint in TKA.

Materials and Methods: The existing axial Merchant view was modified by positioning the standing patient in the semi-squatted position with the knees at 45°. Relationship between X-ray source, the angle of incidence on the joint, and the cassette position, were kept unchanged from the original view. The standing position and consequent muscle involvement were the only differences. The quality of the view was confirmed on a cadaveric knee model with multiple markers. Safety, reproducibility and clinical reliability were obtained in 100 posterior-stabilized TKA’s. These patients were assessed by a new Patella Scoring System (0–100 points). This system considers anterior knee pain, crepitus, stair performance and quadriceps strength. Radiographic abnormalities are calculated as deductions. Intra- and inter-observer variability were obtained comparing the results of two different investigators.

Results: The modified Merchant view showed significant patello-femoral tracking changes in 68% of patients. Twenty-one cases of bone-implant contact were observed when load was applied. Correlation between excellent-good clinical outcome and excellent patello-femoral performance was significantly higher for the Patellar Score compared to Knee Society Clinic or Function scores (p=.022, p=.014). Multivariate regression analysis of radiographic tilt, subluxation, and height, did not correlate with clinical outcomes, whilst bone-implant contact showed higher incidence of pain, particularly when associated with asymmetric patellar resection.

Conclusion: These new patello-femoral clinical and radiological assessment methods employed in the study represent additional valuable tools for the comprehensive evaluation of results in TKA.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.