Abstract
Introduction: Isolated patello-femoral arthritis occurs in up to 10% of patients suffering osteoarthritis of the knee. Reports of patello-femoral replacements have given indifferent results. We report our experience of 350 cases of the Avon Arthroplasty.
Method: In 1994 after experience with the Lubinus prosthesis which had a 50% failure rate at eight years, we defined the design criteria for a new prosthesis. Since September 1996, 350 knees have been treated with this design. Prospective review was undertaken and 150 knees have reached 2 years and 80 knees are at five years with 10 knees at eight years. The outcome was assessed using pain scores, Bartlett’s patella score and the Oxford knee score.
Results: The patients recovered function rapidly and 20 cases (6%) suffered early complications which resolved. The median pain score improved from 15/40 points to 38 at five years. The movement increased from 114 to 120 at five years. The Bartlett patella score improved from 11/30 points to 25 at five years. The Oxford knee score improved from 19/48 points to 40 points at five years.
The functional results are similar or better than those of a total knee replacement. Fourteen patients developed mal-alignment (4%) two of which required distal realignment. There have been no cases of deep infection, fracture, wear or loosening. Twenty seven knees (7%) developed evidence of disease progression, twenty two of which (6%) have required revision to a total knee replacement. Nineteen patients (5%) complained of some persistent anterior knee pain of uncertain cause.
Conclusions: Results to date show a large improvement in pain and function and this improved design has reduced the problems of mal-alignment and polythene wear. There is a low complication rate and an excellent range of movement. Disease progression remains a problem which is not predictable. This type of prosthesis offers an alternative to total knee replacement in this small group of patients with isolated patello-femoral disease with a low morbidity.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
