header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE USE OF A CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR COMPONENT FOR HIP INSTABILITY

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Introduction: Primary and revision total hip surgery in the face of poor neuromuscular function, cognitive impairment or recurrent dislocation are fraught with complications. A useful option for such cases is the constrained acetabular component, or “captive cup”. We present the largest series reported to date, and use radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to assess cup migration.

Method: Between February 1999 and September 2003 126 patients were identified as high risk of dislocation and were treated with a constrained acetabular component. One hundred and sixteen cases were revision arthroplasties and 10 were primary replacements. Patients were assessed pre-operatively (WOMAC, Harris Hip Scores and SF-36). Defects were reconstructed with allograft (massive, morsellised or strut) where required. All components were inserted into uncemented metal cups. Radiostereometric beads were inserted. Post-operatively patients were followed up regularly and clinical scores repeated. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was performed at 6 months, and then annually to assess prosthesis migration.

Results: Mean follow-up was 3.1 years (range 1 – 5.6 years). At last review 8 patients had died, and 2 were lost to follow-up. There were 7 revisions: 3 for infection, 2 for periprosthetic fractures, and 2 for aseptic loosening. There was one case of cup disassociation successfully treated with open reduction. There have been no further dislocations. There was a statistically significant improvement in WOMAC and Harris Hip scores. RSA confirmed cup migration was greater than for non-captive cups, but was nevertheless acceptable: 0.16mm medially, 0.47mm proximally, 0.16mm posteriorly. Interestingly there was no statistically significant difference at 6, 12 and 24 months suggesting most migration occurs early on.

Conclusion: Our results suggest the “captive cup” is an effective and safe option for the treatment of primary and revision arthroplasty in those at high risk of dislocation. RSA analysis confirms minimal prosthesis migration.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.