MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.

W. Puhl; U. Schütz

doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Article alerts Social media

Current issue

MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005

W. Puhl
U. Schütz

MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.

Puhl W, Schütz U. MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.. Orthop Procs. 2006;88-B(SUPP_I):53-53. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Puhl, W., and U. Schütz. “MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION..” Orthopaedic Proceedings, vol. 88-B, no. SUPP_I, 2006, pp. 53-53., https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Puhl, W., & Schütz, U. (2006). MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.. Orthopaedic Proceedings, 88-B(SUPP_I), 53-53. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Puhl, W. and Schütz, U. (2006) “MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION..” Orthopaedic Proceedings, 88-B(SUPP_I), pp. 53-53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Puhl, W., and U. Schütz. “MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION..” Orthopaedic Proceedings 88-B, no. SUPP_I (2006): 53-53. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Puhl W, Schütz U. MIDTERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF A NEW ANATOMICAL ADAPTED STEM SYSTEM FOR CEMENTED AND CEMENTLESS FIXATION.. Orthop Procs. 2006 Mar 1;88-B(SUPP_I):53-53. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88BSUPP_I.0880053c

Copy to clipboard

BibTeX

EndNote

RIS

Abstract

Introduction: 3–5 year follow up results of the new anatomical adapted stem system OptanTM (Zimmer) are presented. Its cross-section in the proximal area corresponds with its antetorsion, anteversion and helitorsion, to the 3D-morphology of the proximal femur. Philosophy and aim of the cementless Optan-stem is a proximal fixation and force transmission in the femoral bone.

Material and Methods: Between July 1999 and Dec. 2001 242 Optan stems (122 cemented, 120 cementless) were implanted in 221 patients (mean age 62.1 y. (20–74 y.), m/ f-ratio 0,8). The clinical and radiological parameters for calculation of Harris Hip Score (HHS), Merle d’Aubigné (MD), WOMAC, periprosthetic bone reaction (Gruen et al.) and periarticular heterotopic bone formation (Brooker et al.) were recorded. An implant migration analysis using two different biplanar radiographic digital measurement systems (DMA, UMA) was done also.

Results: The clinical results for latest follow up examination (3–5 y.p.o.) for cementless (cemented) Optan are: HHS mean (m) 97.6, standard deviation (SD) 7.32 (m 95.1, SD 9.85), MD m 17.6, SD 1.04 (m 17.1, SD 1.48), WOMAC m 1.44, SD 1.56 (m 1.75 ,SD 1.62). Radiographic results of cementless stem show a low rate (29,1%) of secondary endostal reactive line formation in the distal part of the stem (Z3,4,5) beginning 6–12 month postoperative, especially when drilling of femoral bone canal was done. When the distal part of the stem (Z3,5) was fixed directly to cortical bone little hypertrophy of the cortical bone gets relevant 4–5 years p.o. in a few cases. Cemented implantation shows a stable radiographic follow up regarding cement mantle without any periprosthetic bone adaptations. The SD for the varus-valgus angle rises proportional to the thickness of the cement layer. Only little flattening of the calcar cortical bone (Z7b) could be seen in both, cemented and cementless Optan 2–3 years p.o.. No stem migration was evident in both fixation principles. No relevant osteoly-ses and cortical bone hypertrophies could be seen. 12 dislocations (closed reposition), 3 femoral fissures (all while cementless fixation), 3 septic loosenings and no aseptic loosening were documented till now.

Conclusions: Compared with other anatomical stems the cementless Optan shows similar excellent clinical mid-term results. The results of the cemented fixation are not quite so good, this may be related to the older mean age of the patients with cemented stem fixation. Till now, the radiographic results of cementless Optan doesn’t seem to contradict the philosophy of attempted physiological proximal force transmission to the femur. Among other things, the development of the Optan-stem had the aim, to make an interoperative change of fixation technique easier. Using the same stem design the decision about the fixation type can be made intraoperatively.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.