header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPLICATIONS WITH THE USE OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL (P.F.N.)



Abstract

Purpose: Evaluating the rate of complications with the use of Proximal femoral nail (P.F.N.), and discuss the reasons for the complications and their solution.

Material and Methods: During last 4.5 years 308 patients underwent P.F.N. for unstable proximal femoral fracture. The average age of the patients was 75.6 (range 20–96).

A.O. classification. A1: 27. A2: 180. A3: 96. In 7 patients a failed dynamic hip screw (D.H.S.) was changed to P.F.N. All the patients were allowed to begin full weight bearing immediately. In 81% of patients short femoral nail was inserted and in the rest long one.

Results:

Complications:Malfixation(internal-rotation, varus, valgus, shorting, bad position of the screw in the neck) – 10%

Deep infection 0.7%, nonuonion 1%, cut out 2%,

Nail breakage 0.6%, Broken drills, bad position of locking screws.

Solutions:

Re-operation 1.6%, T.H.R. 1.3 %, removal of nail 1.6%, nail change 0.9%.

During the last year we began to use a new and improved insertion set with less complications.

Conclusions: P.F.N. is a valid solution for unstable proximal femoral fractures enabling immediate full weight bearing. P.F.N. may be used as a good salvage procedure for failed dynamic hip screw. The procedure demands accurate and meticulous operative technique in order to avoid technical complications. In cutout nails T.H.R. is a good salvage procedure in older patients.

The abstracts were prepared by Ms Orah Naor. Correspondence should be addressed to Israel Orthopaedic Association at PO Box 7845, Haifa 31074, Israel.