header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CEMENTED FEMORAL REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: 10-YEAR MEAN FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty has been associated with early mechanical failure by aseptic loosening. This study was performed to determine the long-term survival of cemented femoral revision arthroplasty and to identify factors predictive of failure.

Method: One hundred and twenty-nine cemented femoral revision cases were reviewed to determine component survival. Ninety-seven hips with a minimum follow-up of five years were included for survival analysis and tests of significance. Harris hip scores were used to quantify clinical outcomes. Complete radiographic series were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Clinical and surgical factors were analysed to determine if they were predictive of failure.

Results: Individual Harris hip scores improved to a mean of 71 at the most recent follow-up from a mean pre-operative score of 52 (p< 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years was 91%, with revision for aseptic loosening of the femoral component as the endpoint and 71% with mechanical failure as the endpoint. Patients older than 60 years experienced greater long-term component survival and less pain than patients younger than sixty years (p< 0.05). Good quality post-operative cement mantles were associated with better long-term radiographic fixation (p< 0.001). Poor femoral bone quality was significantly associated with an increased rate of re-revision for aseptic loosening (p=0.021).

Conclusion: Revision femoral THA with cement remains an option in selected patients with acceptable 10-year survival and fair radiographic fixation. Patients demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes at 10 years and few experienced significant pain. The best results may be achieved in older patients with adequate bone stock and modern cementing techniques.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.