header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RETROACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS IN CEMENTLESS THA: WHEN TO OPERATE?



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Problem: The timing of liner exchange for retroacetabular osteolysis in THA remains uncertain. Liner exchange should be done before the shell becomes loose.

Purpose: To determine the radiographic quantity of osteolysis that will predict impending loosening of the cementless shell.

Hypothesis: Osteolytic areas differ between loose and stable shells.

Method: Between 1992 and 2002, 71 cementless shells of the same design were revised at our institution; 46 were for aseptic retroacetabular osteolysis. Radiographs and a computer-assisted technique were used to quantify osteolytic areas and percent of shell circumference associated with lesions. Implant stability was confirmed intra-operatively.

Results: Of 26 stable and 20 loose shells, the average area of osteolysis on AP radiographs showed no significant difference (Stable 591mm2, Loose 630 mm2, p greater than 0.05); whereas, lateral radiographs demonstrated a significant difference (Stable 546 mm2, Loose 837 mm2, p 0.05). The percentage of shell circumference with associated osteolysis on AP and lateral films demonstrated a significant difference (AP: Stable 60, Loose 75, p 0.042; LATERAL: Stable 49, Loose 73, p 0.016). Diagnostic criteria of 50 percent shell circumference associated with osteolysis on AP films has sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.27, while the same criteria on lateral films has sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.54 for shell loosening.

Conclusion: Percent of shell circumference with surrounding osteolysis appears to be more predictive of cementless shell loosening than the area of osteolysis. When greater than 50 percent of the shell circumference has osteolysis on AP or lateral films, liner exchange is necessary.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

At least one of the authors is receiving or has received material benefits or support from a commercial source.