header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE FIXION HUMERAL NAIL: THE NORWICH EXPERIENCE OF 42 CASES



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: To evaluate the results of humeral nailing with the new Fixion inflatable humeral nail.

Method: We retrospectively studied 42 patients with acute humeral fractures (20), delayed and non-union (12) and pathological fractures (10), who where treated with an inflatable humeral nail and had a minimum follow-up of six months. Our primary outcome measures were clinical and radiological union. Secondary outcome measures were revision of the nail, screening time and operative time. We made a clinical assessment of the patients using the Constant score of the shoulder and a measure of health-related quality of life, using the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.

Results: In patients with acute fractures 16/19 (84%) went on to clinical and radiological union (1/20 patients died four weeks post-operatively from bronchopneumonia). All of the patients with delayed and non-union of humeral fractures went on to clinical and radiological union. In the patients with pathological fractures, the nail provided good palliative symptom relief. Average screening time was 40.5 seconds (21–107). Average operative time was 71 minutes (26–142). Constant score of the shoulder had a median of 67 (SIQ 46.5–77.5) in the affected arm and 87 (SIQ 74–89) in the normal arm.

Conclusion: The treatment of humeral fractures using the inflatable intramedullary nail is a simple and safe technique, avoiding the time and complications associated with distal locking. Its seems to be an appropriate technique with excellent results in those patients with delayed and non-union of humeral fractures, and provides effective palliation in patients with pathological fractures. Its efficacy in patients with acute fractures is comparable to other intramedullary nails. In our experience, it is particularly effective in the multiply injured and the infirm because of the speed and ease of insertion.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

At least one of the authors is receiving or has received material benefits or support from a commercial source.