header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OUTCOMES FOLLOWING CARPAL TUNNEL DECOMPRESSION IN THE ELDERLY



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: It has been suggested that elderly patients have poorer outcomes following carpal tunnel decompression than younger patients, especially if there is severe compression. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression in the elderly patient and whether the outcome could be predicted from pre-operative nerve conduction studies.

Method: A retrospective study of all patients over 70 years who had a carpal tunnel release over a three-year period at Dunedin Hospital, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Pre-operative nerve conduction studies were graded from one to six according to severity. Patients were followed up by postal questionnaire (Boston carpal tunnel symptom severity score) and telephone follow-up.

Results: 109 procedures were performed in 96 patients. Eight patients had died, two excluded (one with Motor Neurone disease and one acute CTS following fracture) and five were demented and unable to fill out the questionnaire. Eighty-one patients with 92 wrists were available for review. Mean age was 78.6 years. Eighty percent had marked to severe neurophysiological changes (Grade 4–6). Post-operatively, the median Boston score was 1.27 with 84% having a Boston score of < 2.0. Patients were satisfied with the result in 94.6% of procedures. There was a positive correlation between nerve conduction grade and post-operative Boston Score (p=0.042).

Conclusion: Despite nerve conduction studies consistent with marked to severe compression, elderly patients have low symptom severity scores following carpal tunnel decompression and a high rate of satisfaction. Carpal tunnel release in patients over 70 years of age is justified and usually associated with a good outcome.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.