header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

COMPUTER-ASSISTED GAP EQUALISATION (CAGE) IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Computer-assisted bone and soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may aid in achieving perfect knee alignment leading to better function and prosthesis survival. The ‘Measured Resection’ technique was compared to a ‘Computer Assisted Gap Equalisation’ (CAGE) technique of knee balancing in TKA.

Method: TKAs were performed on eight pairs of cadaver knees. One side of each pair was randomly selected to the control group in which measured resection was used for balancing. The experimental technique (CAGE) using a computer-assisted ligament-tensioning device to equalise gap symmetry and load was used on the contralateral side. Post-operatively, a simulator applied forces to the quadriceps and hamstring tendons and a tibial load transducer measured compartmental force at five flexion angles (0, 30, 45, 60, 90 degrees). Outcome assessment consisted of measuring gap loads and symmetry under ligament tension pre-component insertion and compartmental force post-component insertion.

Results: Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the symmetry of the extension (p = 0.27) and flexion (p=0.07) gaps pre-component insertion, there was a trend towards improved gap symmetry in the CAGE group. As well, pre-component insertion there was a significant (p< 0.05) equalisation of flexion and extension gap loads in the CAGE group. However, post-component insertion there was no significant difference (p> 0.05 using 2-way repeated measures ANOVA) in medial to lateral compartment load balance between the two groups. As well, the measured loads with the knee in full extension (zero degrees of flexion) were significantly higher (p< 0.001) in both groups compared to other flexion angles.

Conclusion: CAGE improves knee balance pre-component insertion by improving surgical accuracy with computer-assistance. However, component design, posterior capsular tension and tibial rotation preclude sustaining the improved balance post-component insertion leaving final knee balance unchanged. Further work is needed to translate the improved surgical accuracy into improved balance following component insertion.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.