header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TRENDS IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTY 1990–2003: RESULTS FROM A UK JOINT REGISTER



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: To audit the practice and evaluate the outcomes of knee arthroplasty surgery in a general setting in the UK.

Method: The Trent & Wales Arthroplasty Audit group collects prospective data on all knee replacements performed within these UK health regions (population eight million). All patients are sent a validated, self-administered questionnaire to assess outcomes. Data has been collected on 27,500 primary and 1400 revision knee procedures.

Results: In the period from 1990 to 2002 there has been a marked decrease in the proportion of knees being replaced for rheumatoid arthritis (21% to 5%). More arthroplasties are being performed in men (35% to 46%). There has been an increase in knee arthroplasty in patients aged 85+ yrs (2.1% to 3.7%), but a decrease in patients aged 55yrs and under (8.6% to 5.3%). Uncemented implants are used less frequently (7.7% to 4.4%). Unicompartmental knee are implanted more frequently (2.8% to 4.1%). In 2002, 10% of the joints implanted had mobile bearings, 8% were PCL sacrificing, 28% had the patella resurfaced, 0.4% were patellofemoral replacements.

The percentage of patients satisfied with their arthroplasty one-year post-surgery has not improved over the 13 years. (O.A 81%, R.A 87.5% , trauma 63%). The incidence of reoperation (for all causes) in the first year is 1.2% (0.5% infection). The incidence of revision for implant failure appears to be increasing. Outcome data for revision surgery is being collected at present.

Conclusion: Over the past 13 years there has been a marked increase in knee arthroplasty surgery and significant demographic trends. However, validated outcome measures have not shown an improvement of outcome over this period.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.