header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TRIPLE ARTHRODESIS – IS BONE GRAFTING NECESSARY?



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Non-union following triple arthrodesis has been significant, up to 23%. Iliac crest bone grafting and internal fixation has reduced this to 0–4%. Harvesting bone graft incurs significant donor site morbidity and may be unnecessary. We present the results of 100 triple arthrodeses performed with local graft, avoiding donor site complications.

Method: Between January 1993 and July 2002 the senior author performed 112 triple arthrodeses. We performed a retrospective chart review, evaluating the incidence of union and the post-operative complications, with a minimum follow-up of six months. For this study, we excluded all (seven) revision fusions, and all (five) fusions using iliac crest or other donor site graft (e.g. calcaneus or tibia). One hundred fusions were performed using a standard technique with internal fixation and without supplementary bone graft. All patients were reviewed until fusion had occurred or non-union declared.

Results: Ninety-six patients had one hundred triple arthrodeses, with an average age of 58 years. Fifty fusions were performed for posterior tibial tendon deficiency, 20 for rheumatoid arthritis, seven for osteoarthritis and 12 for post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The remaining 11 cases included: tarsal coalition, psoriatic arthritis and polio. There were 26 males and 74 females, with 37 fusions performed on the right foot and 73 on the left. The average time to union was 5.4 months (range 3–24) with three patients developing non-unions. Of the three patients diagnosed with a non-union, two had fair outcomes and elected to be treated non-operatively. The third non-union had a poor result, and achieved a successful outcome following revision. Overall, there were 74 good outcomes, 22 fair and four poor results. The complications following surgery included: nine wound infections, one DVT, one malunion and seven cases of prominent screws, requiring removal. The one patient with malunion was successfully revised at two years.

Conclusion: The majority of authors advocate the use of iliac crest bone graft during triple arthrodesis. However, harvesting iliac crest graft has a significant short and long-term morbidity. This study indicates that comparable rates of union are achieved without the need for supplementary bone graft and thereby avoiding donor site morbidity.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.