Abstract
Introduction: The magnitude of the initial chondral injury and the residual articular step-off are amongst prognostic factors implicated in outcome following intra-articular fractures. The alignment of an intra-articular fracture line may be an as yet unrecognised prognostic variable.
Hypothesis: That fractures in the coronal plane of the medial femoral condyle result in worse outcomes than those in the sagittal plane.
Aim: To compare the effect of displaced intra-articular osteotomies (ie simulating fractures fixed in an incongruent position) of the medial femoral condyle – in one group performed in the sagittal plane, in the other in the coronal plane.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in two arms: in vitro and in vivo.
In vitro study: A pneumo-electric rig was designed and built. Ten freshly harvested porcine knee joints underwent osteotomy (test specimens: 5 sagittal, 5 coronal). 5 control specimens underwent no osteotomy. Specimens were mounted on the rig and subjected to cyclical flexion and extension under load (40,000 cycles over 11 hours). Transarticular pressure measurements were performed before and after testing. Surface roughness was measured following testing using laser interferometry.
In vivo study: Three groups (A to C), each comprising 15 New Zealand white rabbits were utilised. Rabbits from each group were consigned to a control (5), coronal osteotomy (5) or sagittal osteotomy (5) group. Rabbits in group A were sacrificed at 3 weeks (early outcome), group B at 10 weeks (immediate) and group C at 20 weeks (long term). The knee was then harvested en bloc and prepared for light microscopy. A further 10 specimens underwent electron microscopy of the medial meniscus.
Results:
In vitro study: A significant difference in loading patterns was noted between the sagittal, coronal and control groups. Specimens from the sagittal group sustained significantly more wear on the apposing medial tibial articular surface (p=0.04), with the meniscus having a protective effect on the underlying articular surface.
In vivo study: Light microscopy confirmed degenerative changes in the apposing tibial articular cartilage, being more marked in sagittal specimens. On the femoral side of the knee, the healing response of the femoral osteotomy was significantly better in sagittal test specimens than coronal (p< 0.05).
Conclusion: In contrast to the hypothesis, sagittal femoral step-offs gave rise to more tibial wear. This can be explained by the short duration of exposure of the coronal incongruity to the apposing joint during the flexion extension cycle. The sagittal step-off was constantly exposed, giving rise to persistently elevated tibial joint loading pressures opposite the high side of the step-off.
In contrast, the coronal femoral osteotomies had a worse healing response. The alignment of the fracture line perpendicular to the plane of motion of the joint exposes the repair tissue within it to increased shear and tensile stresses. This may play a negative role in the repair of these coronal defects when compared to sagittal osteotomies, which are relatively protected from the high transarticular pressures and showed a greater tendency to remodel their articular surface.
The abstracts were prepared by Emer Agnew. Correspondence should be addressed to Irish Orthopaedic Association, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland.
