header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY INTO THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF EXTENSOR TENDONS REPAIRS WITH AUGMENTED (MGH) BECKER TECHNIQUE COMBINED WITH STATIC SPLINTING.



Abstract

Aims: To confirm that the augmented (MGH) Becker extensor tendon repair is a strong four-strand technique that allows earlier mobilisation of repaired tendons after only 3/52 of postoperative static splinting and to assess functional outcome using revised disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score.

Methods: In this prospective study we used the augmented Becker (MGH) suturing technique with Ethilon. Postoperatively patients were immobilised 3 weeks in volar splint and then fully mobilised with physiotherapy. 3/12 postoperatively all patients had final assessment in hand clinic for: pulp to palm distance, power grip, pinch grip, pain, Dragan criteria of progress, total active motions (TAM) of the fingers and revised DASH score.

Results: Eighteen patients had extensor tendon lacerations repaired with augmented Becker (MGH) technique. Results were compared with the uninjured hand and statistically evaluated. At the final assessment the average pulp to palm distance was 0cm. All patients had good pinch and power grip (> 80% of uninjured hand for dominant hand and > 60% for non-dominant hand) and were free of pain with excellent progress using Dragan criteria. Average TAM was 268° without statistically significant difference between this and the uninjured side. Average scaled DASH score was 7.6 and within normal values. We had no wound complications or ruptures of repaired tendons.

Conclusion: Augmented (MGH) Becker technique is a strong four-strand extensor tendon repair technique that allows early mobilization of patients after only 3/52 of static splinting postoperatively. Injured fingers can then be safely mobilized with expected full return of movements at 3/12 postoperatively.

The abstracts were prepared by Emer Agnew. Correspondence should be addressed to Irish Orthopaedic Association, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland.