header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS IN MAJOR ORTHOPAEDIC ONCOLOGICAL SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTIONS



Abstract

Introduction: Infection following major orthopaedic oncological surgery is a serious complication and every precaution should be taken to avoid it.

One potential source of infection is the biopsy procedure, particularly when is carried out of a referring centre. In fact up to 30 per cent of patients with soft tissues problems following a biopsy is reported. As an infected biopsy may make subsequent limb preservation surgery impractical, the greatest care should be taken in carrying out the biopsy.

The implantation of foreign materials (prostheses, grafts, acrilic cement, metallic devices, etc) as the duration of the surgical procedure, intraoperative bleeding, possible deep haematomas, presence of drains, increase the risk of infection. Also the importance of haematogenous spread from other sites of infection to joint pros-thesis is well estabilished.

Materials and methods: In this paper the Authors present their experience regarding septic complications after orthopaedic oncologie surgery. From 1988 to 2002, 143 patients underwent a major surgery for the treatment of skeletal neoplasms (wide resection and reconstruction employing modular or composite prostheses, osteoarticular or intercalary allografts, acrylic cement and osteosynthesis devices, major spinal surgery, internal hemipelvectomy, etc).

Results: The patients were followed-up to detect the presence of a septic complication. Also patient’s files were revised to evaluate paramethers related to infection as bleeding, duration of surgery, postoperative fever, neutropenia, ESR and CRP, antibiotic prophylaxis, etc. The overall infection rate was approximately to 15 per cent.

Conclusions: Immunosuppression from previous chemotherapy may predispose the patient to infection which may be occult, but which must be diligently sought.

It has to be also emphasized that if at any stage the patient has had local radiotherapy, the tissues may be fibrosed and avascular and unable to combat local infection effectively.

The Authors retain that the infection after major orthopaedic oncologie surgery could represent a serious threat to the implant and to the limb. The importance of meticolous asepsis practised at every stage has to be emphasized, together with prolonged use of prophylactic antibiotic, specially in immunosuppressed patients or chemotherapy.

The abstracts were prepared by editorial secretary, Mrs K. Papastefanou. Correspondence should be addressed to Professor K.N. Malizos, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessalia, Larissa, 41222 GREECE