header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SELECTIVE ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION IN NEUROMUSCULAR SCOLIOSIS



Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome, radiographic results and complications associated with single rod anterior instrumentation in neuromuscular thoracolumbar scoliosis.

Methods: Retrospective study with mean follow up of 35 months.

Subjects: Nine patients (6F, 3M), mean age 15 years, were operated on between 1994–2000. This heterogeneous patient group consisted of five cases of spinal dysraphism, one prune belly syndrome, one arthrogryposis, one myotonic dystrophy and one congenital myopathic dystrophy (muscle-eye-brain-syndrome). All patients were ambulatory and had minimal pelvic obliquity (< 15degrees).

Outcome measures: Pre-operative, post-operative and final follow-up measurements of Cobb angles, apical vertebral translation (AVT), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal and coronal balance were recorded along with operative complications, pseudarthrosis, metalwork failure and loss of correction.

Results: There was one rod breakage and one case of proximal thoracic curve progression requiring supplementary posterior surgery. For the remaining 7 patients, the average corrections for Cobb angle was 62% (52 to 20 degrees), AVT was 53% (5.7 to 2.7cms), and both thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis remained unchanged. No pseudarthrosis, vascular or neurological complications were encountered. Subjectively results were excellent in six and good in one.

Conclusions: Selective anterior instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis using a single rod resulted in acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in this highly selected series. Advantages include preservation of distal lumbar motion segments whilst maintaining sagittal and coronal alignment. We believe that this method of scoliosis correction has a definite yet select role in patients who are ambulatory, have minimal pelvic obliquity (< 15degrees), non-progressive pathology and near normal mental function.

These abstracts were prepared by Mr. Brian J C Freeman FRCS (Tr & Orth). Correspondence should be addressed to him at The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH.