header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING PROSTHESIS: OUR EXPERIENCE



Abstract

Maintenance of the bone stock is a primary goal in hip surgery. The idea of a resurfacing hip prosthesis had already been proposed in the past without success. The improvement in prosthetic materials, however, has mades it possible to reconsider the use of resurfacing prostheses. We report our experience with the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) prosthesis.

We operated on 58 patients (60 hips, two bilaterally), 31 men, 27 women, with a mean age of 47.9 years (25–76) and a mean follow-up of 27 months (1–42). We used the posterolateral approach with the patient in lateral decubitus. We performed a clinical and radiographic examination before surgery and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. We recorded a statistically significant improvement in the clinical score at 6 months after surgery, with respect to the preoperative examination. Major complications were two fractures of the femoral neck and one infection. We recorded also peri-prosthetic calcifications in two patients, calcifications of the ileopsoas in two and ileopsoas tendinitis in one.

In conclusion, in our experience, the BHR prosthesis reproduced the biomechanics of the hip and minimised the risk of luxation. The preliminary clinical results are encouraging, also for difficult cases.