header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OSTEOINDUCTION IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER LIMB NON-UNIONS: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE



Abstract

Numerous growth factors, together with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), are involved in the biological mechanism of bone induction. BMP 7 combined with collagen type 1 has shown to be effective in triggering the osteoinductive mechanism in the presence of bone defects as an alternative to bone graft. The aim of the present study is to present the experience gained at the Orthopaedic Clinic of Catania with BMP in lower limb non-union or pseudoarthrosis with bone defect after skeletal stabilisation.

From December 2003 to May 2004 at the Orthopaedic Clinic Of Catania four patients were treated using OP 1. The study group comprised three women and one man with a mean age at the time of operation of 27 years (range 23– 32 years). One subject presented with non-union, two patients with normotrophic pseudoarthrosis and one with atrophic pseudoarthrosis. In all cases the bone defect was localised at the tibia. All patients were treated surgically with skeletal stabilisation (one with a monolateral external fixator, one with a T2 intramedullary nail and two with a Gross-Kempf nail) always after decortication of Judet.

Three patients healed with a mean follow-up of 5 months. One subject is still under treatment. None of the patients have any pain and demonstrate complete weight bearing and functional capacity. X-rays showed good consolidation of bone defect.

Clinical and radiographic results obtained at this point are more than fair. Healing time was short without any side effects. It is important to verify whether, in the treatment of lower limb non-union and or pseudoarthrosis, the osteoinductive capacity of the OP 1 could provide the same valid results without good reduction and skeletal stabilisation. The use of OP 1 is extremely interesting for many reasons. However, it would be extremely important to test whether the biological effect is not exclusively related to an optimal mechanical stability.