IPSILATERAL SHOULDER AND ELBOW REPLACEMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Abstract

Aim: Patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis who were managed with ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties were reviewed to determine appropriate sequence of surgery, operative technique and the functional outcome.

Methods: Between 1992 and 2002, twenty-two patients underwent ipsilateral elbow and shoulder arthroplasties. Nineteen patients were available for final review. Clinical and radiological assessments were done on these patients.

Results: Twenty-four upper limbs in nineteen patients were reviewed. Mean age at final follow-up was 61.1 years (49.9 to 73.3yrs; SD 8.2). Mean duration of follow-up from the last operation was 55.5 months (12 to 129.3m; SD 33.5). The average interval between the operations was 40.1 months; it was 41.2 months when elbow operated first and 38.7 months when shoulder was operated first. This difference was not significant (p=0.82). All movements showed significant improvement after respective joint replacements. There was a significantly greater improvement in external rotation of the shoulder when it was operated first (p=0.48). The average improvement in Constant-Murley scores was 28.8 points; with no statistically significant difference between either sequence of operations (p=0.49). However, there was statistically significant improvement in the average Mayo elbow performance score after the elbow arthroplasty when it was operated first (p=0.03).

Two patients needed conversion of shoulder hemi-arthroplasty to total shoulder replacement due to subsequent erosion of the glenoid. One elbow replacement was revised because of recurrent dislocations. There were four patients who developed ulnar neuropathy, of which two were permanent. There were no peri-prosthetic fractures in this series. One patient needed custom-made short-stemmed shoulder prosthesis due to the presence of a long-stemmed humeral component of total elbow prosthesis in situ.

Conclusion: Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements significantly improve pain and function of the limb, when there is advanced arthritis. The joint that appears clinically and radiologically worse should be replaced first. However if both the joints are equally involved we feel that elbow should be replaced first as the functional improvement seems to be better. Careful preoperative planning is required in choosing the type and size of prosthesis, to avoid potential complications.