COMPARISON OF TENSILE STRENGTH OF ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE AND DOUBLE ROW ROTATOR CUFF REPAIRS

Abstract

Purpose: Many different rotator cuff repairs have been advocated in previous publications without experimental evidence. Our aim was to mechanically test the static tensile properties and cyclical loading to failure of a single row lateral anchor repair and a double row medial and lateral anchor repair.

Method: Fresh frozen cadaveric shoulders were mounted on a rig and a mini-open deltoid split used to visualise the supraspinatus. A standardised full thickness incision of 2 cms was made with a scalpel across the supraspinatus tendon. After the deltoid was repaired and specimens randomised, an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed by the two senior authors in which the medial border of the tear was apposed to the lateral border using either a double or single row technique with a ‘Twinfix AB’ suture anchor. Once the repair had been performed, the gross specimens were dissected down to the rotator cuff musculature and the repair inspected. Those with associated cuff pathology were excluded from the experiment. Specimens were then mounted on a custom made rig to statically load each tendon simulating physiological loading of a repaired cuff defect in a post-operative 300 abducted position. The increase in tear size was then measured against time for 1 hour or to a point at which the mean tendon gap formation exceeded 5mm. Each specimen was then transferred to an Instron tensile testing machine to cyclically load to failure the supraspinatus musculotendinous unit. Each specimen was freeze clamped proximally in a specially designed clamp, whilst the humeral shaft was mounted at an angle of 300 of abduction.

Results: The two groups had a distinct difference in tensile properties with the single row fixation developing a 5mm gap in under 30 minutes. After 1 hour, the gap formed in the double row specimens was less than 5mm. In cyclical loading, the single row failed at a lower load compared with the double row. In some double row specimens the tendon failed mid substance above 250N, rather than at the anchor-suture or suture-tendon interface.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the double row mattress technique has superior loading properties when tested with a simulated physiological load comparative to the normal post-operative setting.