header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF GLENOID LABRAL TEARS WITH METALLIC KNOTLESS SUTURE ANCHORS: TWO TO FOUR YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the results of arthroscopic repair of anterior and superior glenoid labral tears in the shoulder with metallic knotless suture anchors with an average follow up of 31 months.

Material and methods: Between 2000 and 2002, 55 patients with labral tears underwent arthroscopic repair with metallic knotless suture anchors (Mitek, Ethicon Ltd). Their average age was 36 years (range 16 to 67). Thirty-seven patients presented with anterior instability. Twenty-one patients presented with painful shoulder without instability. In the instability group there were eight acute dislocations and twenty-nine recurrent dislocations.

All patients underwent examination under anaesthesia, arthroscopic repair of labral tears using the metallic knotless suture anchors, thermal capsulorraphy and closure of the rotator interval. Subacromial decompression was performed when indicated. Rehabilitation consisted of sling immobilisation for four weeks followed by gradual strengthening program over three months with the physiotherapist. Contact sports were allowed at 1 year.

Evaluation: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at the time of final follow-up using Constant score and Modified Rowe – Zarin score system.

Results: Three out of the thirty-seven patients in the instability group had recurrent dislocation. A fourth patient had pain with a positive anterior apprehension test thus making the overall recurrence rate of 11%. In the painful shoulder group, good and excellent results were recorded in twenty out of twenty-one patients (95%). Of the fifty five patients who had labral repair, five had poor functional outcome secondary to pain in their shoulder (9%). One patient had a fall and required further surgery to replace one dislodged anchor.

Conclusions: We found the metallic knotless suture anchor easy to use and stabilised the torn labrum well. The success rate for instability compares well with the published literature. However, we have some concern of our observation of early degenerative changes in some of our patients treated for recurrent dislocation.

Correspondence should be addressed to BESS c/o BOA, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE