header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE GUEPAR RADIAL HEAD PROSTHESIS FOR RECENT AND OLD FRACTURES: 22 CASES



Abstract

Purpose: We reviewed retrospectively 22 patients with recent and old fractures of the radial head treated with the GUEPAR radial head prosthesis which has a mobile metal cup derived from the GUEPAR gliding total elbow prosthesis.

Material and methods: Among the 22 patients, 13 underwent surgery in an emergency setting and four underwent a secondary procedure. Mean age was 41 years and follow-up was 18 months. The Mayo Clinic score was noted. Fractures were total or disengaged cervical fractures and in 72% of the elbows dislocation was associated. The coronoid process was fixed in one elbow, the olecranon in one and the medial ligaments were repaired in five. The status of the humeral condyle was examined in detail before insertion of the prosthesis. We also were particularly attentive concerning the height position of the prosthesis.

Results: There were no complications. Outcome was good among the patients undergoing an emergency procedure with a mean Mayo Clinic score of 83/100, mean force 75%, good motion, particularly 77° pronation, and 79° supination, with good stability and absence of wrist problems. The patients who underwent a secondary procedure had less satisfactory results, particularly for motion (44° pronation and 54° supination). The distal radioulnar index was not perfectly restored. Finally four patients had arthrolysis for limited flexion/extension, three of them in the secondary group.

Discussion: Resection of the radial head is an alternative for complex fractures that has its inconveniences. The first is that it destabilises the elbow in valgus position in the event of injury to the medial ligaments and the second is the ascension of the radius in the event of injury to the interosseous membrane. Fixation is another alternative, but it is difficult and has not provided good results in our hands or in the literature (we have compared this series with a series of 20 fixations for equivalent fractures). The prosthesis appears to be a good solution: it stabilises the elbow, prevents ascension of the radius, allows early rehabilitation, and provides good subjective outcome, particularly in emergency cases.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.