header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

REVISION OF CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A LOCKED FEMORAL STEM, ULTIME: 78 CASES WITH MEAN 4-YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Purpose: We report a series of 78 total hip arthroplasty revisions using a locked femoral stem, Ultime.

Material and methods: These patients presented aseptic loosening (88%) and septic loosening (12%). Fracture was associated in 17%. The preoperative Postel Merle d’Aubligné (PMA) score was 10.2 points. Using the Vives-SOFCOT classification, 29% of the loosenings were stage I, 37% stage II, 24% stage III, and 10% stage IV. All fractures were associated with lossening. We used a femoral window in 57% and trochanterotomy in 14 cases. The first eight patients in this series had an allograft (impacted piecemeal). Most of the patients resumed weight bearing the first week. The PMA score was used to assess outcome. AP and lateral views were used to evaluate stem-bone contact and cortical thickness at three levels.

Results: Early complications were phlebitis (n=1) and superficial haematoma (n=5). Late complications were dislocation (n=6), stem fracture (n=2), deep infection (n=3). At last follow-up, 81% of the aseptic loosenings, 77% of the septic loosenings, and 70% of the fractures on stem had a good or excellent PMA score with a mean gain of 4, 5, and 1 points respectively. Bone reconstruction showed an increase in internal cortical (2 to 4.4 mm) and stem-bone contact increased in the lower two-thirds of the stem. Allografts did not improve results. Furthermore, 28% of the patients had hip pain which could not be related to clinical findings or implant characteristics. Half of the patients were reoperated.

Conclusion: In this series, functional improvement was similar to that in published series. The femoral window facilitated the procedure and decreased intraoperative complications. The Ultime prosthesis met the objectives set by the manufacturer, i.e. primary stability and bone reconstruction authorising subsequent revision.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.