MANAGEMENT OF LOOSENED FEMORAL ELEMENTS USING A LONG CEMENTED STEM: 135 CASES WITH 14-YEAR ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS

Abstract

Purpose: In 1988, the conclusions of the SOFCOT symposium appear to condemn use of cemented implants for revision of loosened femoral elements. Eleven years later, at the 1999 Symposium, Vidalain demonstrated that cementing remains a reasonable alternative. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to estimate long-term results of revisions using a long cemented stem without bone stock reconstruction.

Material and methods: From 1987 to 1995, 135 patients (135 hips) underwent revision surgery with this technique. We retained for analysis 95 hips (15 lost to follow-up 25 deceased patients) in 66 women and 29 men, mean age 70 years at revision (42–86). The preoperative Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) function score was 8/18. Femoral implants in place had been cemented in 80% of the hips. Using the SOFCOT criteria, 65% of the loosenings were stage II, 29.5% stage III. All were aseptic loosenings and the same revision technique was used in all cases: removal-replacement of both prosthetic elements, use of a long cemented stem without associated grafting.

Results: Mean follow-up was eight years (60–157). Thirty nine percent of the patients had early postoperative complications. The mean function score at last follow-up was 14.8/18 with 62.4% of the outcomes considered good or very good. Age, restitution of the rotation centre, quality of cementing, and stem/femur fit influenced the result significantly. Radiographic analysis showed a progressive lucent line in 32% of the hips, only 36% of the femoral stems were totally free of lucent lines. Cumulative actuarial survival was 87% at 14 years and fell to 65.5% considering certain radiographic loosening as the endpoint.

Conclusion: Use of a long cemented femoral stem for revision total hip arthroplasty provides acceptable long-term functional outcome. Results are significantly affected by imperfect technique. This type of implant, which destroys any hop for restoration of bone stock, should be reserved of elderly subject where a more “ambitious” procedure were be too risky.